Before building a biological system you must understand the electrical systems that lay underneath it. For a system to be biologically sound it must be electrically sound.

Presuming that we have fusion changes things biologically. We're a race of life and death, with the curses of the garden of eden upon us, forcing us to toil and fight. Fusion will give us everything we need, and raise us in high water above Eden. It is, itself, the end of God's curses from Eden. High 5. What do we do in that absence, though?

It is as though you are no longer living in your parents' house, and all laws are limited only by what you can buy or not get stopped from doing. Imagine having an infinitely full wallet and this. That is what it will be like. We must keep this in mind when designing new life.

Currently we have intrahuman and social and potential continuity crises form vices such as sexual deviancy, social disorder, etc. Species having niches rely on these instincts to survive. If we build a biology that has only chemical systems to survive, they will have no instincts and probably die. Species have intrapersonal instincts that they acquire or develop mentally during their life according to their DNA and experiences. We need to *code* this. How would you?

An electromental 8>9 that is unchecked will produce an unsavory field which could cause a normally vibrating cell to become cancer. That is bad. A poor set of instincts and other factors could cause unhealthy em pathways and weak immune systems. This is probably how 'fitness' is generated and organized. We need to *code* this. Not just fuck up some seed that exists already.

God is raising a species. We've been raised by God for thousands of years. GM species have no benefits of coded instincts. The sperm-egg style reproduction and the womb almost certainly introduces fitness tests on fetuses that we do not in the laboratory. We can insert any dna into the egg, without the dna being required to be housed and checked off by a male, produce a functioning sperm, which is a prototype, or pass the egg's em selection process, which most science hardly recognizes. We do have the check of the egg needing to live and grow properly to a fit species, especially if implanted into the womb, where it would be interacted with by a mother considering continuing investing energy in the fetus.

Consider static electricity and DNA strands.

Those tests should be good enough if they're good enough for God. We should insert dna into a sperm and then have that sperm do its job with an egg freely instead. That is a good way for the dna to pass two tests, but it will also not pass the seemingly random DNA selection process from the two contributing parents.

We could make all the desired DNA dominant, which may have to do with collected em charge of the codons. They may collect more charge as particles as static electrical circuits when they are used. More frequently used codons or codon sets may become more dominant. Is this true? Let's measure the relative em strength of segments of DNA. We might be able to change dominance in DNA codons.